MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2614985712 · doi:10.5942/jawwa.2017.109.0099

Predicting Water Quality Impact After District Metered Area Implementation in a Full‐Scale Drinking Water Distribution System

2017· article· en· W2614985712 on OpenAlexaff
Vanessa Cristina Dias, Marie‐Claude Besner, Michèle Prévost

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Water Works Association · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsComputer Research Institute of MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater qualityEnvironmental scienceInletTurbidityWater supplyTrihalomethaneSampling (signal processing)Residence time distributionEnvironmental engineeringHydrology (agriculture)Water treatmentEngineeringGeologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pressure management using district metered areas (DMAs) can reduce leakage and break frequencies and extend the service life of pipes in drinking water networks. Valves must be closed, creating DMAs, resulting in hydraulic changes and increasing the number of dead ends. A field study of five pilot DMAs was conducted using an enhanced sampling program. Water quality was measured at different locations inside and outside DMA boundaries before and after implementation. Overall water quality did not change following DMA implementation. However, water quality (chlorine residuals, turbidity, and metals) was degraded at locations with elevated water residence times such as created dead ends, sites outside DMA boundaries, and extremities. An approach based on the combination of hydraulic modeling and water quality was developed to predict trihalomethane concentrations in the DMA using measurements only from an inlet site. Utilities can use a combination of hydraulic modeling and targeted monitoring to predict water quality changes after DMA implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Water Works AssociationSame topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207