MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mixed Lymphocyte Reaction in a Standardized Flow Cytometry Panel

2017· article· en· W2615344327 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anne Halpin, Morgan Sosniuk, Simon Urschel, Patricia Campbell, I. Larsen, Lori J. West

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlow cytometryMixed lymphocyte reactionImmunophenotypingImmunologyCD8MedicineLymphocyteTransplantationPeripheral blood mononuclear cellThymectomyT cellCell growthAndrologyImmune systemBiologyInternal medicineIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Donor-specific antibody (DSA) and antibody (Ab)-mediated rejection are a challenge for long-term outcomes accelerating graft vasculopathy and limiting options for re-transplantation. Sensitizing events such as homograft use in surgical procedures, assist device implantation, and transfusions may lead to sensitization and development of HLA-Ab. Thymectomy is routinely performed during pediatric heart surgery; our overarching goal is to study the impact of thymectomy and its role in de novo DSA. In order to study donor-recipient allorecognition, we evaluated the mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) for alloreactive T cell proliferation combined with a standardized flow cytometry lymphocyte phenotyping panel (Duraclone IM, Beckman Coulter) widely used in the Canadian National Transplant Research Program and the ONE Study, providing standardized data across sites. Methods: Pre- and post-transplant de novo DSA data from our clinical laboratory were analysed (n = 117; data not shown). MLR and flow phenotyping were performed using adult and pediatric control peripheral blood mononuclear cells and irradiated pooled HLA-mismatched third-party splenocytes. Cell proliferation was visualized using CellTrace Violet dye combined with the flow panel (Duraclone Immunophenotyping panel) or BrdU incorporation ELISA (n = 12). Results: The BrdU assay demonstrated proliferation in response to non-self HLA but lacked the ability to identify which cell populations proliferated. Proliferation dye was readily detected within the standardized panel. Unstimulated cells did not proliferate whereas mitogen stimulated cells showed strong proliferation. Phenotypic changes comparing pre- to post-MLR analysis included decreased %T cells (although %CD4 and %CD8 remained consistent), increased %B cells, increased %NK cells, decreased % NKT cells and monocyte disappearance. Small sample size (0.2 × 106 cells) was sufficient for phenotyping thus enabling use in a pediatric population. Conclusion: Our preliminary results show this flow panel, in combination with CellTrace proliferation dye, is a novel way to update detection of cell proliferation in an MLR assay; the standardized assay can allow detection of alloimmune responses in individual patients in a reproducible manner from patient to patient and centre to centre, and provide an opportunity to standardize clinical investigation of immune responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207