Designing a survivorship program for head and neck cancer patients.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e17007 Background: Our institution receives approximately 700 new patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) annually. A need was identified to develop, provide and evaluate services for the unique needs of HNC patients and their families. Methods: A dual leadership model was established, involving two HNC specialists: an advanced practice nurse and a radiation oncologist. After a literature search and environmental survey, we contacted identified H&N survivorship programs. Internal participants were identified from the HNC clinical team and existing institutional survivorship program. We established interdisciplinary Steering (focused on development and oversight of clinical & education programs) and Research (tasked with assessing needs and outcomes) committees. We sought consensus on program principles, scope, a definition of survivorship, and a theoretical model of the HNC journey. A half-day retreat including community partners and patient/family representatives was held to set 5-year priorities. Results: Little published literature on survivorship initiatives specific to HNC exists. Three HNC survivorship clinical or research programs were identified; the largest (established in 2009) was visited, while telephone contact was made with investigators at the others. Principles guiding program development included interdisciplinary collaboration, grass-roots expertise, and a holistic scope. We defined survivors as all HNC patients and their families, from diagnosis through death. Program scope includes physical, emotional, social, financial, functional and psychosocial needs. A theoretical map of the cancer journey and evolving challenges was developed. The retreat included 50 participants, representing 20 different roles. We identified these top priorities: 1) Establish a post-treatment team; 2) Make survivorship a (mandatory) standard of care; 3) Optimize patient navigation; 4) Match services to specific patient groups (eg. men); 5) Expand access to allied health services; and 6) Develop a clinical care pathway. Conclusions: Survivorship is a complex and evolving area of research and care delivery. A team-based, comprehensive approach has been developed to address the needs of the highly specialized HNC population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".