Squamosal Suture Synostosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Squamosal suture craniosynostosis is thought to be a relatively rare entity. In the authors' experience, it is underreported in imaging examinations and the existing literature. The authors sought to determine the incidence of squamosal synostosis, whether it is increasing in frequency, and its relationship with synostosis of the major calvarial sutures.Patients undergoing computed tomography imaging for suspected craniosynostosis over a 15-year period were reviewed by a plastic surgeon and pediatric neuroradiologist. Patients with synostosis of the squamosal sutures were identified and involvement of additional sutures, gender, and the presence of a known syndromic diagnosis were recorded. Patients greater than 4 years of age or those with prior craniofacial surgery were excluded.One hundred twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria, 26 of whom had squamosal suture synostosis (26/125, 20.8%). Squamosal synostosis was found in isolation in 3 patients (3/26, 11.5%), with 1 additional major suture in 10 patients (10/26, 38.5%), and ≥2 major sutures in 13 patients (13/26, 50%). Squamosal synostosis was more common in patients with a syndromic diagnosis (11/26 syndromic, 15/99 nonsyndromic, P < 0.001). Eleven of 26 patients with squamosal synostosis were identified in the radiology report (42.3%).Craniosynostosis of the squamosal suture is much more common than previously reported and can contribute to abnormal head shape in isolation, or in combination with major sutures. Squamosal suture synostosis is underdiagnosed clinically and radiologically, although insufficient evidence exists to determine if its true incidence is increasing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".