MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2615644558 · doi:10.1109/ted.2017.2699969

Assessment of High-Frequency Performance Limit of Black Phosphorus Field-Effect Transistors

2017· article· en· W2615644558 on OpenAlexafffund
Demin Yin, AbdulAziz AlMutairi, Youngki Yoon

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topic2D Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsField-effect transistorPhysicsLimit (mathematics)TransistorTopology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringQuantum mechanicsVoltageMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, gigahertz frequencies have been reported with black phosphorus (BP) field-effect transistors (FETs), yet the high-frequency performance limit has remained unexplored. Here we project the frequency limit of BP FETs based on rigorous atomistic quantum transport simulations and the small-signal circuit model. Our selfconsistent nonequilibrium Green's function (NEGF) simulation results show that semiconducting BP FETs exhibit clear saturation behaviors with the drain voltage, unlike zerobandgap graphene devices, leading to >10 THz frequencies for both intrinsic cutoff frequency (fT) and unity power gain frequency (fmax). To develop keen insight into practical devices, we discuss the optimization of fTand fmaxby varying various device parameters such as channel length (Lch), oxide thickness, device width, gate resistance, contact resistance, and parasitic capacitance. Although extrinsic fTand fmaxcan be significantly affected by the contact resistance and parasitic capacitance, they can remain near THz frequency range (fT= 900 GHz; fmax= 1.2 THz) through proper engineering, particularly with an aggressive channel length scaling (Lch≈ 10 nm). Our benchmark against the experimental data indicates that there still exists large room for optimization in fabrication, suggesting further advancement of high-frequency performance of stateof-the-art BP FETs for the future analog and radio-frequency applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Electron DevicesSame topic2D Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207