MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2615687706 · doi:10.2527/jas.2017.1372

Standardized ileal digestible amino acid contents of canola meal from Canadian crushing plants for growing pigs1

2017· article· en· W2615687706 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Deborah Adewole, Anna Rogiewicz, B. Dyck, C. M. Nyachoti, B.A. Slominski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaCanola Council of Canada
KeywordsCanolaMealAnimal scienceFood scienceBrassicaChemistryBiologyAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies have shown that there are variations in the chemical and nutritive composition of canola meal (CM) produced in Canada, some of which may result from differences among the canola seed crushing plants. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the variability in the nutritive value of CM as its end users desire increased meal consistency and more information on any potential variability in AA digestibility. Thus, 18 ileal cannulated barrows (average initial BW = 23.3 kg) were used to determine the apparent (AID) and standardized (SID) ileal digestibility of N and AA and standardized ileal digestible N and AA contents in CM from 6 processing plants in Canada. Two processing plants provided CM in both mash and pellet forms, whereas the other 4 provided it only in mash form, giving a total of 8 CM samples. The barrows were fed 9 cornstarch-based diets. The first 8 diets were formulated to contain the CM samples as the only source of AA. The ninth diet was a casein-cornstarch diet to determine ileal endogenous AA losses. All diets contained 0.3% titanium dioxide as an indigestible marker. Pigs were housed individually in pens and were fed the 9 diets in a completely randomized design for 3 periods to give 6 pigs per diet. Each experimental period lasted for 7 d, consisting of 5 d of adaptation and 2 d of ileal digesta collection at 2-h intervals from 0800 to 2000 h on d 6 and 7. There was an effect ( < 0.05) of CM source on 1) the AID of N, Met, Cys, Thr, Val, Gly, and Ser; 2) the SID of N, Met, and Cys; and 3) the standardized ileal digestible content of all AA. Pelleting reduced ( < 0.05) the standardized ileal digestible content of Arg, Ile, Glu, and Gly in 1 of the CM samples tested and of all AA except His in the other CM sample. The SID values for Arg, Lys, Met, and Thr averaged 87.2%, 78.2%, 84.5%, and 74.1%, respectively. The standardized ileal digestible contents of Arg, Lys, Met, and Thr averaged 2.10%, 1.71%, 0.50%, and 1.01%, respectively. In conclusion, there were variations in the AID, SID, and standardized ileal digestible AA contents of CM among crushing plants in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207