MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

First in Human Study with GSK2857916, an Antibody Drug Conjugated to Microtubule-Disrupting Agent Directed Against B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Results from Study BMA117159 Part 1 Dose Escalation

2016· article· en· W2615766380 on OpenAlexaff
Adam D. Cohen, Rakesh Popat, Suzanne Trudel, Paul G. Richardson, Ed N. Libby, Nikoletta Lendvai, Larry D. Anderson, Heather J. Sutherland, Stephen DeWall, Catherine Ellis, Zangdong He, Jolly Mazumdar, Catherine Wang, Joanna Opalinska, Peter M. Voorhees

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMultiple myelomaAntibodyPharmacologyImmunologyPharmacokineticsPlasma cellTransplantationCancer researchInternal medicineOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Expression of BCMA, a cell surface receptor in the TNF superfamily, is restricted to B cells at later stages of differentiation and is requisite for the survival of long lived plasma cells. BCMA is expressed on MM cells at variable levels. GSK2857916 is a humanized IgG1 anti-BCMA antibody conjugated to the microtubule disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin-F via a stable, protease-resistant maleimidocaproyl linker. Upon binding to BCMA, GSK2857916 is rapidly internalized and active drug is released within the cell. GSK2857916 also exhibits enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity resulting from afucosylation of the FC domain which increases affinity to FCγRIIIa expressed on immune effector cells. The rationale for investigating GSK2857916 in MM is supported by the restricted pattern of BCMA expression and by evidence from preclinical studies. Methods BMA117159 (NCT02064387) is a Phase I open-label study investigating safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), antidrug antibodies (ADA) and clinical activity of GSK2857916 in relapsed/refractory MM and other hematologic malignancies expressing BCMA. Dose escalation (Part 1) is conducted exclusively in MM patients; primary objective is safety, determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose. GSK2857916 is administered every 3 weeks as a1 hr intravenous infusion with no mandatory prophylaxis for infusion related reactions (IRR). Bayesian Logistic Regression Model is applied for dose recommendations. Eligible MM patients must have prior treatments with alkylators, proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators and stem cell transplantation, if transplant eligible, and have documented disease progression on or within 60 days of last therapy. Additional key inclusion criteria include: ANC >1x109/L; hemoglobin >8 g/dL; PLT >50x109/L; INR <1.5; PTT <1.5xULN; total bilirubin ≤1.25xULN; AST and ALT <1.5xULN; serum creatinine <1.2xULN or calculated creatinine clearance >60 mL/min; albuminuria <500mg/24hr; LVEF >50% and troponin <1xULN. Patients remain on treatment until progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal or completing 16 treatment cycles. Blood is collected for PK and ADA analyses; blood and bone marrow aspirates are collected for PD analyses. Results To date 24 MM patients have enrolled and completed the 21 day DLT observation period. Patients were enrolled at the following 8 dose levels: 0.03 (n=1); 0.06 (n=1); 0.12 (n=4); 0.24 (n=4); 0.48 (n=4); 0.96 (n=3); 1.92 (n=4), and 3.4 mg/kg (n=3). The median age is 60 years (range 39-71); 50% are male. Eighty-three percent received ≥4 prior lines. Sixty-three percent had IgG and 29% had IgA types. Seven patients (29%) had adverse cytogenetics defined as del17p13, or t(4;14) . Overall, 23 patients (96%) experienced adverse events (AE); the most frequent (≥20%) regardless of cause were nausea (42%), fatigue (38%), anemia (29%), chills (29%), pyrexia (29%), thrombocytopenia (29%), dry eye (21%), and hypercalcemia (21%). Grade 3/4 AEs reported in ≥10% of patients were thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia. Eight serious AEs were reported in 6 patients with 1 event of limbal stem cell dysfunction considered drug related; this event has not resolved. There were no AEs leading to treatment discontinuation. Four patients required dose reduction due to AEs: ocular toxicity (n=1), corneal disorder/ocular toxicity (n=1), dry eyes (n=1), and keratitis (n=1). IRRs (all Grade 1 or 2) were reported in 7 patients (29%) across dose levels and occurred with the first dose administration. The most frequent symptoms were chills. No DLTs were reported. Sixteen patients discontinued treatment due to disease progression (n=14), patient decision (n=1), completing 16 cycles of scheduled treatment (n=1); 8 patients are ongoing. There was1 MR at 0.24 mg/kg, and 1 VGPR, 3 PR, and1 MR at doses ≥0.96 mg/kg; resulting in a clinical benefit rate of 25% (unconfirmed responses). Conclusion GSK2857916 was well tolerated with no DLTs up to 3.4mg/kg q3w; MTD was not reached. AEs were manageable with ocular toxicity emerging as the most frequent reason for dose modifications. Clinical activity has been seen at higher doses. Complete safety, ADA, PD, and clinical activity data from all dose levels evaluated in Part 1 for q3w schedule will be presented. Study is funded by GlaxoSmithKline; drug linker technology is licensed from Seattle Genetics Disclosures Cohen: Janssen: Consultancy; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Trudel:Glaxo Smith Kline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria; Oncoethix: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Richardson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Anderson:Takeda: Speakers Bureau; AMGEN/Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Celegene: Speakers Bureau. DeWall:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ellis:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. He:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mazumdar:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Opalinska:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Voorhees:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Celgene, BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207