Real-time prediction of water level change using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate water levels modelling and prediction is essential for maritime applications. Water prediction is traditionally developed using the least-squares-based harmonic analysis method based on water level change (WLC) measurements. If long water level measurements are not obtained from the tide gauge, accurate water levels prediction cannot be estimated. To overcome the above limitations, the wavelet neural network (WNN) has recently been developed for the WLC prediction from short water level measurements. However, a new adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model is proposed and developed in this paper. The ANFIS model is utilized to predict and select the WLC models of one month of hourly WLC for Yarmouth, Sain-John and Charlottetown stations in Canadian waters and compared with the current-state-of-the-art WNN model. The statistical analysis is applied to analyse the performance of the developed model in training and testing stages. The results showed an accurate modelling level using ANFIS technique for each station in training and testing stage. A comparison between the developed ANFIS method and the current-state-of-the-art WNN method shows that the accuracy of the developed ANFIS model is superior to the current-state-of-the-art model by 21.5% in average.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it