MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2616229707 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2016-0938

Wavelet analysis on the drag-reducing characteristics of turbulent channel flow with surfactant additive based on experimental data

2017· article· en· W2616229707 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lu Wang, Zhi-Ying Zheng, Jiaqi Bao, Tong-Zhou Wei, Feng‐Chen Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntermittencyTurbulencePhysicsDragMechanicsParticle image velocimetryReynolds numberOpen-channel flowClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two-dimensional velocity fields for turbulent channel flows of water and 50 ppm CTAC/NaSal (cetyltrimethyl ammonium chloride/sodium salicylate) solution were experimentally obtained by particle image velocimetry. Multi-scale decompositions of the fluctuating velocity signals were performed by two-dimensional binary orthogonal discrete wavelet to analyze the influence of surfactant additives on the multi-scale characteristics of turbulent channel flow. From the results of wavelet multi-scale decompositions, it can be observed that the quantity of coherent structures near the wall in CTAC solution flow is decreased obviously. The results of the flatness factor show that the addition of drag-reducing additives inhibits the intermittency in turbulence. By analyzing the distribution of local intermittence measure and local Reynolds shear measure, it is found that the intermittency mainly concentrates near the wall, and the intermittent region distinctly reduces in CTAC solution flow compared with that in water flow. By combining the analysis of the motion of coherent structures in turbulent channel flow, it is shown that surfactant additives mainly and distinctly impact the coherent structures near the wall, especially in the viscous layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207