MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2616319928 · doi:10.30576/2414-2050.2015.01.5

Odontogenic Myxofibroma in a Paediatric Patient: Case Report and Review of the Literature

2018· article· en· W2616319928 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lorenzo Lo Muzio

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Journal of Oral Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral and Maxillofacial Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMandible (arthropod mouthpart)RadiographyOdontogenicOdontogenic myxomaLesionRadiological weaponDentistryRadiologySurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a case report of an Odontogenic myxofibroma in a paediatric patient. This lesion, also called odontogenic myxoma, is an uncommon benign odontogenic tumour that derives from mesenchymal elements. Odontogenic myxofibroma in paediatric age is rare, because is more frequently discovered between the second and the fourth decade. Clinical, radiological and histological examinations were performed. Clinical examination showed a 3 cm painful swelling in the anterior mandible, and the panoramic radiograph confirmed the presence of an ovoid, well-definite radiotransparent area. Histologically, the odontogenic myxofibroma was characterized by an abundant mucoid stroma containing angular, spindle-shaped and rounded cells. The young age of the patient was considered an indication to perform a conservative approach, with the goal of avoiding the extraction of the elements interested. As reported in literature, the follow-up management depends on several variables, such as location, size, age of onset, and the type of surgical treatment. After 5 years, clinical and radiographic follow up showed no recurrence and the integrity of the anterior mandibular teeth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Journal of Oral ScienceSame topicOral and Maxillofacial PathologyFrench-language works237,207