PRINCIPLE OF RESPONSIBILITY CARRIERS BY THE AIR ACCORDING TO INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE IMPLEMENTATION IN INDONESIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Air transport has an important role in all fields, It is therefore important for Indonesia to increase the potential for aerospace. In addition to potential aircraft accidents, every aviation accidents has every juridical impact, particularly the responsibility of the airline (carrier) to the passenger and the owner of the goods (baggage and cargo). In Febru ary 2009 last year the lion air aircraft type MD 90 landing without front wheel in Batam Hang Nadim Airport, which resulted several passengers suffered minor injuries and severe shock. In this case there are several problems namely how the principle of responsibility of the carrier according to international law, how the principle of responsibility of the carrier related to the case of lion air plane emergency ianding without front wheels at Hang Nadim Airport Batam in 2009 and what are the constraints and efforts in the implementation of responsibility of Lion Air plane case in Batam in 2009. This minithesis research using normative juridical lawo the study of primary legal materials, secondary, and tertiary obtained from the research literature. bata processing used techniques and qualitative analysis. Responsibilify in international carriers set forth in the Warsaw Convention of 1929 and the amandement about Unification of Certain Rules to International Carriage by Air while in the national law is in the Air Transportation Ordinance 1939 Stb. 100 and in the Law Number I Year 2A09 on Aviation and the Government Regulation Number 40 of 1995 on Air Transport. The principle of absolute liability (absolute liability) is a responsibility that is used in national and international world at this moment, where the carrier is absolutely responsible for damage sustained in case of death or bodily injury such as that contained in Article 17 of the Montreal Convention 1999 and Article 141 Law Number I Year 2009.In carrying out its responsibilities, Lion Air has apptied the principle of absolute responsibility of the passenger.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".