MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2616914134

PRINCIPLE OF RESPONSIBILITY CARRIERS BY THE AIR ACCORDING TO INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE IMPLEMENTATION IN INDONESIA

2010· dissertation· en· W2616914134 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDocument Repository (Universitas Andalas) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiabilityAviation lawAviationLawInternational lawBill of ladingAir travelAir transportBusinessEngineeringPolitical scienceAeronauticsAerospace engineeringPublic international law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Air transport has an important role in all fields, It is therefore important for Indonesia to increase the potential for aerospace. In addition to potential aircraft accidents, every aviation accidents has every juridical impact, particularly the responsibility of the airline (carrier) to the passenger and the owner of the goods (baggage and cargo). In Febru ary 2009 last year the lion air aircraft type MD 90 landing without front wheel in Batam Hang Nadim Airport, which resulted several passengers suffered minor injuries and severe shock. In this case there are several problems namely how the principle of responsibility of the carrier according to international law, how the principle of responsibility of the carrier related to the case of lion air plane emergency ianding without front wheels at Hang Nadim Airport Batam in 2009 and what are the constraints and efforts in the implementation of responsibility of Lion Air plane case in Batam in 2009. This minithesis research using normative juridical lawo the study of primary legal materials, secondary, and tertiary obtained from the research literature. bata processing used techniques and qualitative analysis. Responsibilify in international carriers set forth in the Warsaw Convention of 1929 and the amandement about Unification of Certain Rules to International Carriage by Air while in the national law is in the Air Transportation Ordinance 1939 Stb. 100 and in the Law Number I Year 2A09 on Aviation and the Government Regulation Number 40 of 1995 on Air Transport. The principle of absolute liability (absolute liability) is a responsibility that is used in national and international world at this moment, where the carrier is absolutely responsible for damage sustained in case of death or bodily injury such as that contained in Article 17 of the Montreal Convention 1999 and Article 141 Law Number I Year 2009.In carrying out its responsibilities, Lion Air has apptied the principle of absolute responsibility of the passenger.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.015
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDocument Repository (Universitas Andalas)Same topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207