Development of Waste Gas Recirculation System with Improvement of Sintering Productivity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, several type of the waste gas recirculation system have been wildly applied to reduce total volume of waste gas to be treated and reduce the coke breeze consumption. In conventional sintering process, the waste gas conditions below sinter bed is specific distributions under usual operation such as permeability, flowrate, temperature, moisture and SOx, Nox, Dioxine emission. A various layouts of the waste gas recirculation system has been developed to satisfy the demand of a specific plant condition. EOS and LEEP recycle 45~50% of the mixed waste gas onto the entire sinter bed and resulting in a 45~50% decrease of the waste gas treatment and emission. EPOSINT recycles 35% of waste gas from the bottom of the bed where temperature is high and the hot exhaust gas from the sinter cooler is mixed with the gas to increase energy efficiency. In these three types of waste gas recirculation system, the hot waste gas is reused in fore or middle part of sinter bed to help drying the raw material and coke combustion, therefore energy savings are verified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it