Reaction Progress Kinetics Analysis of 1,3-Disiloxanediols as Hydrogen-Bonding Catalysts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1,3-Disiloxanediols are effective hydrogen-bonding catalysts that exhibit enhanced activity relative to silanediols and triarylsilanols. The catalytic activity for a series of 1,3-disiloxanediols, including naphthyl-substituted and unsymmetrical siloxanes, has been quantified and compared relative to other silanol and thiourea catalysts using the Friedel Crafts addition of indole to trans-β-nitrostyrene. An in-depth kinetic study using reaction progress kinetic analysis (RPKA) has been performed to probe the catalyst behavior of 1,3-disiloxanediols. The data confirm that the disiloxanediol-catalyzed addition reaction is first order in catalyst over all concentrations studied with no evidence of catalyst self-association. 1,3-Disiloxanediols proved to be robust and recoverable catalysts with no deactivation under reaction conditions. No product inhibition is observed, and competitive binding studies with nitro-containing additives suggest that 1,3-disiloxanediols bind weakly to nitro groups but are strongly activating for catalysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".