A stability evaluation of a novel titanium dental implant/interconnected porous hydroxyapatite complex under functional loading conditions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability of implant/interconnected porous calcium hydroxyapatite complex (implant/IPCHA-complex) under functional loading. Implant/IP-CHA-complexes were placed into the mandibles of four Beagle-Labrador hybrid dogs (complex-group). On the other side, an implant was placed directly (control-group). To subject the loading, the animals were fed a hard diet throughout the loading phase of 5 months. The implant stability quotients (ISQs) and bone implant contact (BIC), and histological evaluations were performed. The ISQs of implant/IP-CHA-complex was significantly lower at placement than that of the control-implant. On the other hand, there was no significant difference between in the groups during loading. The BIC measurements, there was no significantly difference between in both groups. Histologically, newly formed bone was observed in contact with most of the implant surface in the complex-group. An IP-CHA/implant-complex would be able to achieve both bone reconstruction and implant stability under functional loading conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it