Adolescence et affiliation: Les risques de devenir soi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comment les adolescents d'aujourd'hui prennent-ils leur place dans leur filiation et en quoi cette demarche reflete- t-elle les transformations familiales et les realites societales actuelles ? En quoi les marginalites et les aleas de la construction identitaire observes chez nombre de jeunes en mal de filiation imposent-ils une ecoute et des pratiques specifiques ? Ces questions nous ont semble de nature a interpeller les cliniciens et chercheurs, tant francais que quebecois, qui discutent ici de la question de l'affiliation, si nevralgique au passage adolescent, en la considerant en regard du processus d'inscription sociale correspondant a la prise d'autonomie chez l'adolescent et le jeune adulte. S'adressant aux intervenants et aux professionnels de toutes les disciplines, les auteurs se sont penches sur la realite des jeunes engages dans un parcours d'etudes tout autant que sur celle d'adolescents en marge de la societe. A cet egard, ils ont examine la problematique des jeunes de la rue, le devenir des jeunes autochtones ou encore la situation de jeunes d'origine etrangere, en considerant la conflictualite souvent traumatique ainsi que les enjeux filiatifs qu'ont a affronter ces adolescents et, par suite, les modalites d'intervention qu'appelle la rencontre avec eux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".