Quantitative Structure – Pharmacokinetic Relationships for Plasma Clearance of Basic Drugs with Consideration of the Major Elimination Pathway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The success of a new drug candidate is determined not only by its efficacy and safety, but also by proper pharmacokinetic behavior. The early prediction of pharmacokinetic parameters could save time and resources and accelerate drug development process. Plasma clearance (CL) is one of the key determinants of drug dosing regimen. The aim of the study is development of quantitative structure - pharmacokinetics relationships (QSPkRs) for the CL. METHODS: A dataset consisted of 263 basic drugs, which chemical structures were described by 154 descriptors. Genetic algorithm, stepwise regression and multiple linear regression were used for variable selection and model development. Predictive ability of the models was assessed by internal and external validation. Results. A number of significant QSPkR models for the CL were derived with respect to the primary elimination pathway (renal excretion, metabolism, or CYP3A4 mediated biotransformation), as well for the unbound clearance (CLu). The models were able to predict 52 - 80% of the drugs from external validation sets within the 2-fold error of the experimental values with geometric mean fold error 1.57 - 2.00. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma protein binding was the major restrictive factor for the CL of drugs, primarily cleared by metabolism. The clearance was favored by lipophilicity and several structural features like OH-groups, aromatic rings, large hydrophobic centers, aliphatic groups, connected with electro-negative atoms, and non-substituted aromatic C-atoms. The presence of Cl-atoms and abundance of 6-member aromatic rings or fused rings had negative effect. The presence of ether O-atoms contributed negatively to the CL of both metabolism and renally excreted drugs, and urine excretion was favored by the presence of 3-valence N-atoms. These findings give insight on the main structural features governing plasma CL of basic drugs and could serve as a guide for lead optimization in the drug development process. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see "For Readers") may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue's contents page.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".