MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617606150 · doi:10.3749/canmin.1600008

From Structure Topology To Chemical Composition. XXII. Titanium Silicates: Revision of the Crystal Structure of Jinshajiangite, NaBaFe<sup>2+</sup><sub>4</sub>Ti<sub>2</sub>(Si<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub>)<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>(OH)<sub>2</sub>F, A Group-II TS-Block Mineral

2016· article· en· W2617606150 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOctahedronElectron microprobeCrystallographyCrystal structureTitaniumCrystal (programming language)SilicateChemistryMaterials scienceMineralogyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The crystal structure of jinshajiangite from the Verkhnee Espe deposit, Kazakhstan, NaBaFe 2+ 4 Ti 2 (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 O 2 (OH) 2 F, was refined from a twinned crystal to R 1 = 3.13% on the basis of 6745 unique reflections [ F o > 4σ F o ], space group , Z = 8, a 10.7059(5), b 13.7992(7), c 20.760(1) A, α 90.008(1), β 94.972(1), γ 89.984(1)°, V 3055.4(4) A 3 . The crystal used for the structure refinement was analyzed by electron microprobe. The empirical formula was calculated on 19 (O + F), with (OH + F) = 3 pfu : (Na 0.77 Ca 0.23 ) Σ1 (Ba 0.60 K 0.36 ) Σ0.96 (Fe 2+ 2.33 Fe 3+ 0.26 Mn 1.26 Zr 0.04 Mg 0.02 Zn 0.01 ) Σ3.92 (Ti 1.79 Nb 0.18 Mg 0.02 Al 0.01 ) Σ4 (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 O 3.93 H 1.93 F 1.07 , Z = 8; Fe 2 O 3 was calculated by analogy with jinshajiangite from Norra Karr, Sweden (Sokolova et al . 2009a) and H 2 O from the crystal-structure analysis. In the crystal structure, TS (Titanium Silicate) and I (Intermediate) blocks alternate along c . The TS block consists of HOH sheets (H-heteropolyhedral, O-octahedral). The topology of the TS block is as in Group II of the TS-block minerals where Ti (+ Nb) = 2 apfu . In the O sheet, ten [6] M O sites are occupied mainly by Fe 2+ , with O –φ> = 2.181 A. In the H sheet, four [6] M H sites are occupied mainly by Ti, with H –φ> = 1.954 A, and eight [4] Si sites are occupied by Si, with = 1.622 A. The M H octahedra and Si 2 O 7 groups constitute the H sheet. Fluorine atoms and OH groups are ordered at the X P M (H sheet) and X O A (O sheet) sites, respectively. The TS blocks link via common vertices of M H octahedra, i.e ., M H –X P M – M H bridges. In the I block, Ba and K occur at the two A P sites, with Ba > K, and the two B P sites are occupied by Na and Ca, with Na > Ca. Jinshajiangite is isostructural with bobshannonite, Na 2 KBa(Nb,Ti) 4 Mn 8 (Si 2 O 7 ) 4 O 4 (OH) 4 (O,F) 2 , Z = 4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it