MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617606150 · doi:10.3749/canmin.1600008

From Structure Topology To Chemical Composition. XXII. Titanium Silicates: Revision of the Crystal Structure of Jinshajiangite, NaBaFe<sup>2+</sup><sub>4</sub>Ti<sub>2</sub>(Si<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub>)<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>(OH)<sub>2</sub>F, A Group-II TS-Block Mineral

2016· article· en· W2617606150 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Fernando Cámara, Elena Sokolova, F. C. Hawthorne

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOctahedronElectron microprobeCrystallographyCrystal structureTitaniumCrystal (programming language)SilicateChemistryMaterials scienceMineralogyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The crystal structure of jinshajiangite from the Verkhnee Espe deposit, Kazakhstan, NaBaFe 2+ 4 Ti 2 (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 O 2 (OH) 2 F, was refined from a twinned crystal to R 1 = 3.13% on the basis of 6745 unique reflections [ F o > 4σ F o ], space group , Z = 8, a 10.7059(5), b 13.7992(7), c 20.760(1) A, α 90.008(1), β 94.972(1), γ 89.984(1)°, V 3055.4(4) A 3 . The crystal used for the structure refinement was analyzed by electron microprobe. The empirical formula was calculated on 19 (O + F), with (OH + F) = 3 pfu : (Na 0.77 Ca 0.23 ) Σ1 (Ba 0.60 K 0.36 ) Σ0.96 (Fe 2+ 2.33 Fe 3+ 0.26 Mn 1.26 Zr 0.04 Mg 0.02 Zn 0.01 ) Σ3.92 (Ti 1.79 Nb 0.18 Mg 0.02 Al 0.01 ) Σ4 (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 O 3.93 H 1.93 F 1.07 , Z = 8; Fe 2 O 3 was calculated by analogy with jinshajiangite from Norra Karr, Sweden (Sokolova et al . 2009a) and H 2 O from the crystal-structure analysis. In the crystal structure, TS (Titanium Silicate) and I (Intermediate) blocks alternate along c . The TS block consists of HOH sheets (H-heteropolyhedral, O-octahedral). The topology of the TS block is as in Group II of the TS-block minerals where Ti (+ Nb) = 2 apfu . In the O sheet, ten [6] M O sites are occupied mainly by Fe 2+ , with O –φ> = 2.181 A. In the H sheet, four [6] M H sites are occupied mainly by Ti, with H –φ> = 1.954 A, and eight [4] Si sites are occupied by Si, with = 1.622 A. The M H octahedra and Si 2 O 7 groups constitute the H sheet. Fluorine atoms and OH groups are ordered at the X P M (H sheet) and X O A (O sheet) sites, respectively. The TS blocks link via common vertices of M H octahedra, i.e ., M H –X P M – M H bridges. In the I block, Ba and K occur at the two A P sites, with Ba > K, and the two B P sites are occupied by Na and Ca, with Na > Ca. Jinshajiangite is isostructural with bobshannonite, Na 2 KBa(Nb,Ti) 4 Mn 8 (Si 2 O 7 ) 4 O 4 (OH) 4 (O,F) 2 , Z = 4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207