MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617819998 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201700433

Увеличение вовлеченных в разработку запасов нефти с помощью картирования ВНК в процессе бурения методом сверхглубокого электромагнитного каротажа

2017· article· ru· W2617819998 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Vetsak, Б. Яблонски, И. Туниссен

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings · 2017
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringGeologyFaciesLithologyDrillingLogging while drillingReservoir modelingOil sandsPetrologyFossil fuelOil reservesFormation evaluationWellborePetroleum industryPetroleumGeomorphologyStructural basinPaleontologyEngineeringArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The real-time interpretation of Extra-Deep Azimuthal Resistivity LWD measurements resulted in the extended reservoir characterization of the lithological heterogeneity of the Fort McMurray Formation, including clean sand facies, inclined heterolithic stratification (IHS) facies, and mud-filled channel facies. This lithology was compounded by fluid heterogeneity within the reservoir, including irregular Oil-Water Contacts (OWC), partial reservoir charging, lean zones and top gas zones. The increase in actual exploited oil reserves (quantitative), was estimated at more than 50 percent compared to the projected reserves exploited by the planned wellbore trajectory. This new formation evaluation approach was proven while drilling four horizontal producers in the unconsolidated oil reserves with high reservoir heterogeneity, which stressed the need for operators to fully understand their subsurface in order to maximize oil recovery. This new logging-while-drilling approach offers an opportunity to better understand the oil reservoir, which ultimately leads to increased production performance of Oil Sands projects. Utilization of this technology in future projects will fundamentally change the efficiency of drilling and completion practices within the oil industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedingsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207