MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617857442 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.180103

Defect motion in a quantum solid with spin: hcp <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>He</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>

2017· article· lv· W2617857442 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhi Gang Cheng, John Beamish

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2017
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpinsImpurityCondensed matter physicsPhysicsMaterials scienceAtomic physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Defect motion in solid helium has a unique quantum nature due to the large zero-point motion of helium atoms, which allows vacancies and isotopic impurities to tunnel and move ballistically. Recent shear modulus experiments showed that dislocations are also extraordinarily mobile in solid $^{4}\mathrm{He}$. The lighter isotope, $^{3}\mathrm{He}$, has even larger zero-point motion and an extra degree of freedom---nuclear spin---which can affect defect motion. We have measured the shear modulus of hcp solid $^{3}\mathrm{He}$ to probe the motion of dislocations and isotopic impurities. We observed a crossover between stiff and soft states, due to $^{4}\mathrm{He}$ impurities which immobilize dislocations at low temperatures. In contrast to solid $^{4}\mathrm{He}$, the impurities in hcp $^{3}\mathrm{He}$ act as static pinning sites because of the disordered configuration of $^{3}\mathrm{He}$ nuclear spins. In addition, we observed an unexpected dissipation that increased rapidly at low frequencies, indicating a strong interaction between nuclear spins and moving dislocations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207