MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617945496 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nox083.199

MEDU-50. TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION OF THE HOMEOBOX GENES CRX AND OTX2 - IMPLICATIONS FOR MEDULLOBLASTOMA GROUP 3

2017· article· en· W2617945496 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Hejazi, Jamie Zagozewski, David D. Eisenstat

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomeoboxChromatin immunoprecipitationBiologyReporter geneEnhancerPsychological repressionPromoterRegulation of gene expressionDLX5Cell biologyTranscription factorGeneticsMolecular biologyGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Generation of disease-specific models and development of new treatments for non-WNT/non-SHH medulloblastomas (MB) is an urgent need. Group 3 MB is characterized by amplifications of MYC and/or OTX2. Furthermore, transcriptional profiling of group 3 MB shows dysregulation of GABAergic and/or photoreceptor gene expression. The distalless/DLX homeobox genes are required for regulation of GABAergic interneuron differentiation and migration. Furthermore, in the retinas of the Dlx1/Dlx2 double knockout (DKO) mouse, which die at birth, there is marked upregulation of the cone rod homeobox, Crx, as well as the related orthodenticle homeobox gene, Otx2. Moreover, OTX2 activates Crx expression. Otx2 is expressed in three domains of the developing central nervous system (CNS): at the hindbrain/midbrain boundary, the forebrain and retina. METHODS/RESULTS: Using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) of wild-type mouse embryonic retinas and a specific antibody to DLX2, we have identified regions within regulatory elements of the Crx and Otx2 promoters, respectively. DLX2 protein:Crx/Otx2 DNA binding specificity was confirmed by mobility shift assays, including supershifts using the DLX2 antibody, as well as through site-directed mutagenesis of candidate homeodomain DNA binding motifs. Reporter gene assays demonstrated repression of Crx and/or Otx2 expression when co-transfected with Dlx2 expression constructs in vitro. De-repression of CRX and/or OTX2 expression was confirmed in the Dlx1/Dlx2 DKO in vivo. In addition, crossing of a Crx lacZ reporter mouse with the Dlx1/Dlx2 DKO showed increased lacZ expression in the retinas of the reporter mouse with concurrent loss of of Dlx1 and Dlx2 function. CONCLUSIONS: DLX2 directly binds to both Crx and Otx2 promoters in the embryonic retina and represses expression of Crx and Otx2. We are exploring other upstream transcriptional regulators of OTX2 in the developing CNS towards the development of a group 3 MB mouse model for testing novel therapeutic approaches for children with an intermediate to poor prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207