Coenzyme Q10 supplementation in the management of statin-associated myalgia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Statins are indicated for use as first-line therapy in the prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events (e.g., myocardial infarction, stroke) in patients with or at risk for cardiovascular disease.1 However, muscle-related adverse effects, including myopathy, often limit the use of statins in practice. Myopathy is a general term that encompasses myalgia (muscle pain), muscle weakness, and cramps.2 Statin-associated myalgia (SAM) has occurred in 0.1–5.0% of patients in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of statins; those figures likely represent an underestimation of SAM frequency due to the studies’ exclusion of patients with a history of SAM or intolerant to statins during the run-in phase.3,–5 Symptoms of SAM often include muscle pain, aches, weakness, and cramps, which may or may not correspond to an elevation in serum levels of creatine kinase (CK). In practice, SAM is often managed by lowering the dosage of the suspected offending drug, switching agents, or using alternate dosing strategies (e.g., every-other-day or once-weekly dosing).6 Persistence in prescribing of different statins and statin doses is recommended due to the relative lack of evidence of cardiovascular benefit with other lipid-lowering agents (e.g., ezetimibe, fibrates, niacin).1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".