Quelle communication pour quel changement?: Les dessous du changement social
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comme le noud du changementInternet, blogues, Web 2.0, mondialisation, culture, immigration, identite. Autant de termes qui illustrent le changement tel que vecu par des milliards d'individus dans le monde. Est-on suffisamment outille pour y faire face ? Quels sont les enjeux cruciaux qui meritent d'etre souleves et analyses ? Quels sont les defis de la communication face au changement ? L'individu peut-il etre reduit a l'usage des technologies ou a la reception des medias ? Quelle place la recherche francophone en communication occupe-t-elle dans ce malstrom ? Les quelque vingt textes de cet ouvrage se penchent d'abord sur la place de la communication dans le changement social en developpant une posture theorique et critique. Ils abordent la question des changements technologiques que connait le monde et analysent la societe de l'information, le Web 2.0 et la collaboration comme autant de phenomenes symbolisant le changement social. Ils s'interessent a la dynamique mediatique du changement, et etudient l'evolution des cultures tout comme les representations des communautes culturelles dans les medias. Enfin, les auteurs questionnent le caractere distinct de la recherche francophone en communication en se penchant sur des regions aussi diversifiees que la France, le Quebec, les Antilles et d'autres.Par sa polyvalence, l'ouvrage s'adresse autant aux etudiants en communication qu'aux chercheurs qui desirent approfondir certains aspects de leur champ d'expertise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".