MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

H-Reflex Plasticity Following Cast Immobilization Of Distal Radius Wrist Fractures

2017· article· en· W2618510272 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Yee, Natasha G. Boyes, Geoffrey Johnston, Joel L. Lanovaz, Jonathan P. Farthing

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWristMedicineForearmH-reflexReflexRange of motionElectromyographyNuclear medicineAnatomyAnesthesiaSurgeryPhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Hoffmann (H)-reflex has been used as a recovery marker in disuse-immobilization models. The data is limited on the effects of forearm immobilization on the H-reflex, especially in clinical populations. PURPOSE: To determine H-reflex changes following a distal radius wrist fracture requiring cast immobilization. METHODS: Five fracture (FX) patients (4 W; 1 M; age: 45.2±18.9 yrs; ht: 164.1±7.0 cm; wt: 64.4±4.9 kg) and five uninjured age-matched controls (CON) (4 W; 1 M; age: 44.6±17.3 yrs; ht: 171.5±5.5 cm; wt: 68.9±8.8 kg) were enrolled. FX group was measured four times up to 12-weeks post fracture; the CON group was tracked over the same period, with measures taken at least three weeks apart. Hmax and Mmax were elicited in the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) of each arm via stimulation of the median nerve (0.5 ms pulse) under a 10% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). A recruitment curve was built using 0.5 mA increments. Measures included wrist flexion (WF) torque (dynamometer), peak electromyography (EMG) amplitude normalized to Mmax, grip strength, range of motion (ROM; goniometry), muscle thickness (MT; ultrasound), and function via Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). RESULTS: In the fractured limb, Hmax:Mmax amplitude ratio (23.0±16.1 to 23.1±12.0%) did not change over time (p > 0.05), but Hmax:Mmax stimulation ratio significantly decreased: 70.5±2.9% to 63.1±4.5% (p < 0.05). WF increased during recovery (6.4±1.2 to 8.5±2.3 Nm; p < 0.05), but normalized EMG during MVC showed a decreasing trend from 18.3±6.4 to 13.8±9.6% Mmax (p = 0.054). Time main effects were also evident for MT (2.7±0.5 to 3.2±0.5cm; p < 0.05), grip strength (6.0±6.8 to 19.6±8.5kg; p < 0.001), wrist ROM (87.9±18.7 to 119.4±20.5°; p < 0.05), and PRWE (84±24 to 28±32 score; p < 0.001), all reflecting incomplete recovery up to 12-weeks post fracture. No significant differences were shown for the uninjured arm of FX group or in any measures for CON, except WF MVC (24.7±7.2 to 22.0±6.9Nm; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although peak amplitude of the H-reflex did not change during recovery, decreased intensity needed to evoke Hmax could reflect changes to the excitability of spinal circuitry after wrist fracture. These data have important therapeutic implications for understanding how the nervous system is impacted after wrist fracture and cast immobilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies→French-language works237,207→