MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2618618196 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2017-0015

New <i>Saurorhynchus</i> (Actinopterygii: Saurichthyidae) material from the Early Jurassic of Alberta, Canada

2017· article· en· W2618618196 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Erin E. Maxwell, Rowan C. Martindale

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsActinopterygiiPaleontologyGeologyPermianTetrapod (structure)Range (aeronautics)CanyonGenusBiostratigraphyInvertebrateStructural basinFish <Actinopterygii>EcologyBiologyFisheryGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Saurichthyidae are a family of elongate, piscivorous actinopterygian fishes with a stratigraphic range extending from the late Permian to the Middle Jurassic. There are four recognized Early Jurassic species, all from Europe and all referred to the genus Saurorhynchus. Only a single non-European Jurassic occurrence has been reported, a partial Saurorhynchus skull from the Fernie Formation of western Alberta, Canada. Here, we evaluate the Saurorhynchus material from Canada, including a new skull from Ya Ha Tinda, Alberta, and a fragmentary mandible from Canyon Creek, Alberta. All diagnostic Canadian Saurorhynchus specimens are consistent with the European species Saurorhynchus acutus, on the basis of external narial morphology and reduced dermal ornamentation. Saurorhynchus acutus was present in the Toarcian of western North America from the tenuicostatum Zone to the late serpentinum – early bifrons Zone, similar to the stratigraphic range documented in Europe. The absence of divergence between eastern Panthalassan and western Tethyan saurichthyids is surprising, given that divergence has been well-documented in coeval invertebrates. Saurorhynchus may have had slower rates of morphological evolution than contemporaneous marine invertebrates; alternatively greater mobility, broader environmental tolerance, or both in these fish may have allowed ongoing gene flow between the two oceanic basins in the early Toarcian.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207