Art's Challenge: An Analysis of the Role of Aesthetics in the Work of Hugo von Hofmannsthal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Art poses itself to us as a challenge: when we confront a work of art, we are in turn confronted with the question of how to be after the encounter. My research pursues Hofmannsthal’s treatment of this challenge by examining his depiction of the aesthetic encounter in literary form. I argue that Hofmannsthal’s evolving understanding of the aesthetic begins to incorporate the ethical by way of a dialogical structure that emerges out of the encounter with art, things, and people. This kind of encounter is characterised simultaneously by the viewer’s creative boldness and reverential humility. To illustrate this, I analyse a selection of Hofmannsthal’s works treating the aesthetic and its role in the encounter. In Chapter 1, I consider the meaning of beauty in Das Märchen der 672. Nacht, a tale which depicts uncanny encounters with beautiful objects. For Chapter 2, I offer a reading of Die Briefe des Zurückgekehrten, a series of fictional letters which culminate in an encounter with Van Gogh’s paintings. Augenblicke in Griechenland, the focus of Chapter 3, explores what I interpret to be the dialogical nature of the encounter with art of the past. In Chapter 4, the final chapter, I analyse the tale Die Frau ohne Schatten (which forms a pendant to Das Märchen der 672. Nacht) with a view to the parallel stories of the two-fold rebirth of art and ethical human relations. Hofmannsthal’s work almost never ends in resolution, except in such fairy-tale stories as Die Frau ohne Schatten. But even the resolution of this story is, from a certain perspective, a false one. An analysis of the marriage of ethics and aesthetics leads us to an inescapable aporia. Hofmannsthal’s way to the aporia, however, is one that raises fundamental questions about our understanding of art, what it does, and how we respond.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".