MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2618762187 · doi:10.2215/cjn.10791016

Randomized Controlled Trial for the Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Vascular Stiffness in CKD

2017· article· en· W2618762187 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Adeera Levin, Mila Tang, Taylor Perry, Nadia Zalunardo, Monica Beaulieu, Joshua A. Dubland, Kelly Zerr, Ognjenka Djurdjev

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSt. Paul's HospitalBC Cancer Agency
FundersKidney Foundation of CanadaPfizer
KeywordsMedicinePulse wave velocityCalcifediolCalcitriolInternal medicineVitamin D and neurologyPlaceboParathyroid hormoneProteinuriaArterial stiffnessEndocrinologyGastroenterologyvitamin D deficiencyUrologyBlood pressureKidneyCalciumPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and objectives Vitamin D is implicated in vascular health in CKD. This study compared placebo, calcifediol, and calcitriol treatment with changes in vascular stiffness, BP, proteinuria, mineral metabolism parameters, C-reactive protein, and fibroblast growth factor 23 in patients with stable CKD. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in out-patient CKD clinics in Vancouver, Canada, from February of 2011 to August of 2014, enrolling 119 patients with an eGFR of 15–45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . Change in pulse wave velocity (PWV) was measured after 6 months of treatment with a fixed dose of oral calcifediol (5000 IU 25-hydroxyvitamin D 3 ), calcitriol (0.5 µ g 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D 3 ), or placebo, thrice weekly. Results Eighty-seven participants were evaluated. Mean age was 66 years, 71% were men, 40% were diabetic, and mean baseline PWV was 11.5 m/s (SD=3.9 m/s). After 6 months, the PWV decreased in the calcifediol group (mean change, −1.1; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], −2.2 to 0.1 m/s), remained unchanged in the calcitriol group (mean change, 0.2; 95% CI, −0.9 to 1.4 m/s), and increased in the placebo group (mean change, 1.1; 95% CI, −0.1 to 2.2 m/s). The overall P value for between-arm changes was 0.03. Absolute PWV change was significantly different between groups ( P =0.04): the combined vitamin D treatment group saw decreased PWV (mean change, −0.4; 95% CI, −1.2 to 0.4 m/s) whereas the placebo group saw increased PWV (mean change, +1.1; 95% CI, −0.1 to 2.2 m/s). The treatment group demonstrated significantly decreased serum parathyroid hormone (mean difference, −0.5; 95% CI, −0.7 to −0.3 ln[pg/ml]; P <0.001) and increased calcium (mean difference, 0.4; 95% CI, −0.1 to 0.7 mg/dl; P =0.02). In observational analysis, participants in the highest 25-hydroxyvitamin D tertile at trial end had significant decreases in PWV (mean change, −1.0; 95% CI, −2.0 to 0.0 m/s) compared with the middle and lowest tertiles ( P <0.01). Side effects were minor and rare. Conclusions Six months of supplemental vitamin D analogs at fixed doses may achieve a reduction of PWV in patients with advanced CKD. Because the treatment effect was attenuated when baseline PWV was included as a covariate, these findings should be replicated in larger populations and further studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Randomized triallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Randomized triallow
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.006
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Journal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207