Fuzzy controlled object manipulation using a three-fingered robotic hand
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Use of underactuated fingers to conduct precision, in-hand manipulation is a common topic of recent robotics research, mostly due to their relatively light weight and simplicity of use. Grasping operations are facilitated by compliant joints however precise, in-hand manipulation is more challenging since post-grasp orientation of an object varies. Underactuated, robotic-fingered hands that are capable of predictable grasping are one step closer to human-like end-effectors. This paper presents a new effort towards effective robotic manipulation using two underactuated fingers and one fully actuated robotic thumb with 3 degrees of freedom (DOF). Fuzzy grasping using tactile feedback is used to provide an enhanced stable grasp solution. The system comprises tactile feedback, orientation of underactuated phalanges using flexible joints, and thumb trajectory planning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it