MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2619033968 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfx150.sp481

SP481DALTEPARIN SODIUM FOR THE PREVENTION OF CLOTTING IN THE EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCUIT DURING HEMODIALYSIS: A PHASE IIIB OPEN-LABEL STUDY TO OPTIMIZE A SINGLE BOLUS DOSE—THE PARROT STUDY

2017· article· en· W2619033968 on OpenAlexaff
Steven Soroka, Mohsen Agharazii, Sandra Donnelly, Louise Roy, Norman Muirhead, Serge Cournoyer, Martin MacKinnon, Neesh Pannu, Brendan J. Barrett, François Madore, Jo‐Anne Wilson, Fiona Hilton, Nancy Sherman, Kevin D. Wolter, John Orazem, Guillaume Feugère

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAbdominal vascular conditions and treatments
Canadian institutionsHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalMemorial University of NewfoundlandHorizon Health NetworkHôpital Charles-Le MoyneLondon Health Sciences CentrePfizer (Canada)University of AlbertaUniversité de MontréalWilliam Osler Health SystemDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHemodialysisBolus (digestion)ExtracorporealSurgeryAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Dalteparin sodium, a low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), is indicated for prevention of clotting in the extracorporeal system during hemodialysis (HD). Product labelling recommends a fixed, single bolus dose of 5000 international units (IU) for HD sessions lasting <4 hours. However, flexible dosing above or below 5000 IU may be beneficial. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of dalteparin sodium during HD, using a flexible-dose regimen. METHODS: This was a single-arm study of patients with chronic renal failure who require 3-4 HD sessions per week lasting up to 4 hours per session, previously receiving unfractionated heparin or LMWHs. Participants received a bolus of dalteparin sodium 5000 IU, administered into the arterial side of the dialysis circuit. Dalteparin sodium dose could be adjusted (+/- 500 or 1000 IU) at subsequent HD sessions (<20 sessions) when clinically indicated, with no specified dose limits. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of successful HD sessions, defined as an HD session that was conducted without termination due to clotting. Fixed and flexible dosing regimens were compared using a split-sample statistical approach. RESULTS: Of a total 2827 HD sessions (152 participants; mean age, 57.1 years; 69.7% male), 2776 (98.2%) were evaluable for efficacy, and 2774 were successful (99.9%; [95% CI: 99.7, 100]). A total of 79 participants (52.3%) received ≥1 dose adjustment (average dose, 5488 IU; range, 500-13,000 IU), mostly due to clotting or access compression time >10 minutes. The median difference in the proportion of successful HD sessions between the fixed and flexible dosing regimens was −0.1% (95% CI: −0.3%, 0.1%). Grade 3 and 4 clotting occurred in 402 (14.5%) and 77 (2.8%) HD sessions, respectively. Of 2818 (99.7%) HD sessions evaluable for safety, 65 (2.3%) were associated with minor bleeding, and 1 (0.04%) with a clinically relevant non-major bleed. There were no major bleeds or deaths reported during the study. CONCLUSIONS: A flexible dalteparin sodium dosing regimen was safe and effective in patients with chronic renal failure requiring 3-4 HD session per week, and may have clinical benefits over the standard fixed-dose regimen for preventing clotting in the extracorporeal circuit during HD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicAbdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207