MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2619203778 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfx177.mp595

MP595THE CEREBROVASCULAR AND NEUROCOGNITIVE EFFECTS OF HAEMODIALYSIS

2017· article· en· W2619203778 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark Findlay, Deborah McGlynn, Jesse Dawson, Patrick B. Mark

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological and metabolic disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeurocognitiveHemodialysisCardiologyInternal medicinePsychiatryCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Stroke and cognitive impairment are common in the haemodialysis (HD) population. It is possible that HD induced alterations in the cerebral circulation contribute. We assessed cognitive function in HD patients to describe the frequency of occult cognitive impairment, and performed assessments both on & off dialysis to explore if changes in cerebral blood flow during HD affect cognitive function. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study in adult patients receiving HD for established renal failure (ERF). Those with known cerebrovascular or cognitive impairment were excluded. A detailed neurocognitive assessment was performed during a routine dialysis session and on a non-dialysis day (with a 4 week gap to reduce learning effect). Cognitive testing included use of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (using an accepted cut-off to define cognitive impairment) and additional tests of language, memory, processing speed and executive function. Mean flow velocity (MFV) was measured in the middle cerebral artery during dialysis using Transcranial Doppler ultrasound. We compared cognitive function and MFV on and off dialysis and assessed the relationship between any changes using Spearman’s rank correlation. RESULTS: 97 participants were enrolled (median age 59 [IQR 51, 67] years, 40% female, median duration of ERF 1.76 years [IQR 0.6, 3.98]. 88 participants attended both visits. Cognitive impairment was present in 44 participants (50%). Those with CI were more likely to have a history of hypertension (95.5 v 81.8%) and a higher recorded mean systolic blood pressure (148.3 vs 132.4mmHg) than those without (p<0.05). MFV declined during dialysis (mean; 49.8 to 43.21cm/s, p<0.001). Changes in MFV correlated with UF volume and presence of diabetes but not change in blood pressure. Participants scored lower on tests of processing speed and executive function during dialysis when compared to their non-dialysis day scores. Decline in test scores for language and executive function significantly correlated with the dialysis-related fall in MFV, p<0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Occult cognitive impairment is common and cognitive function was demonstrably worse during dialysis. Cerebral blood flow is reduced during HD and relates to UF volume and the decline in cognitive function seen. Ongoing study is examining whether the changes in MFV and cognitive function are related to long term decline in cognitive function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicNeurological and metabolic disordersFrench-language works237,207