TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA TERHADAP PELARANGAN MENYELURUH RANJAU ANTI-PERSONEL DI INDONESIA DALAM KONFLIK BERSENJATA DI ACEH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Convention on the Total Prohibition of Anti-Personnel Mines, was formed with a view to realizing the "Free Mine World ". Indonesia has ratified the convention, commonly known as the Ottawa Convention 1997 to the Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2006. As a State Party, Indonesia is obliged to fulfill all the provisions of the convention and the most important is the commitment to protect every citizen from falling victim to anti-personnel mines. In armed conflict of Aceh, mines were used by both parties that the Government of the Republic of Indonesia and the Free Aceh Movement, indications are casualties is dominated by civilians after the armed conflict stopped. For these reasons, the parties are considered not to comply and execute its responsibility of each as intended conventions and International Humanitarian Law Principles. The reality is stands to reason, because the implementation of the state responsibility principle for the total prohibition anti-personnel mines are less than the maximum and seemed to slow. The problem lies in the lack of political will of both parties to keep the peace and support the development agendas in Aceh on going basis, especially with completing problems arising from the existence of anti-personnel mines. State Responsibility Towards a Total Prohibition Anti-Personnel Mines in Indonesia in Armed Conflict of Aceh
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".