MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2619375293 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxx076

Rh sensitization in Canada is not obsolete

2017· article· en· W2619375293 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jillian M. Baker, Douglas M. Campbell, Vinod K. Bhutani, Michael Sgro

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Health and Biochemistry
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSensitizationMedicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 35-year-old G3P1TA1 female, blood type A-negative was found to have anti-D antibodies during her previous pregnancy, and that infant required intensive phototherapy for jaundice. Early in her current pregnancy, high-titre anti-D antibodies were detected. However, unexpectedly, fetal transfusion was not required. This infant was born at 36 weeks gestation by induced vaginal delivery for fetal anemia and was clinically well. The infant’s blood type was A-positive and the direct antibody (DAT) on the cord blood was positive with maternal anti-D on the infant’s red blood cells (RBCs). The infant’s indirect bilirubin was 165 µmol/L at 6 hours of life and climbed steadily (rate of rise 5 µmol/L/hour) during the first few days of life despite anticipatory intensive phototherapy. The hemoglobin on the cord blood complete blood count (CBC) was slightly low at 130 g/L. On day 2 and 3 of life, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was administered (1 g/kg/dose) in an effort to avoid the need for exchange transfusion (1,2). The hemoglobin fell slowly over the course of the first 3 days of life and the infant was transfused packed RBC twice in the first week of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicNeonatal Health and BiochemistryFrench-language works237,207