Les droits fondamentaux du travail et le développement économique du Québec : obstacles et perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To say that labor law is inherently linked to the economic system is a truism. The existence of the employment contract is a necessary condition to the establishment of a market structured by the capitalist firm as a production unit. Thus, since wage labor first started to emerge in the West, labor law has aimed to establish some “ rules of the game” to structure the market. However, the reduction of trade barriers and the free movement of persons and capital which we witness in today’s world tend to generate a high level of competition between jurisdictions. This new situation operates a reversal of the hierarchical relationship between juridical and economical logics. As outsourcing of the production and the search for greater flexibility on the employment market exacerbates concerns for the workers, the social rights that have already been granted to them are being strongly criticized on the grounds that they constitute barriers to the proper functioning of firms and to foreign investment attractiveness. What needs to be retained from this huge upheaval ? What is the future of social law in Quebec ? This text proposes to revisit the genesis of labor law and to study the connexions that may exist between this field of law and the economic system, in light of the current context of globalization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".