MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2619463669 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.205426

Aharonov-Bohm oscillations in phosphorene quantum rings

2017· article· en· W2619463669 on OpenAlexafffund
L. L. Li, Dean Moldovan, P. Vasilopoulos, F. M. Peeters

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topic2D Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsPhysicsZigzagCondensed matter physicsAmplitudeElectric fieldGatingWave functionRing (chemistry)Atomic physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect in square phosphorene quantum rings, with armchair and zigzag edges, is investigated using the tight-binding method. The energy spectra and wave functions of such rings, obtained as a function of the magnetic flux $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}$ threading the ring, are strongly influenced by the ring width $W$, an in-plane electric field ${E}_{p}$, and a side-gating potential ${V}_{g}$. Compared to a square dot, the ring shows an enhanced confinement due to its inner edges and an interedge coupling along the zigzag direction, both of which strongly affect the energy spectrum and the wave functions. The energy spectrum that is gapped consists of a regular part, of conduction (valence) band states, that shows the usual AB oscillations in the higher- (lower-) energy region, and of edge states, in the gap, that exhibit no AB oscillations. As the width $W$ decreases, the AB oscillations become more distinct and regular and their period is close to ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{0}/2$, where the flux quantum ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}}_{0}=h/e$ is the period of an ideal circular ring ($W\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$). Both the electric field ${E}_{p}$ and the side-gating potential ${V}_{g}$ reduce the amplitude of the AB oscillations. The amplitude can be effectively tuned by ${E}_{p}$ or ${V}_{g}$ and exhibits an anisotropic behavior for different field directions or side-gating configurations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topic2D Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207