Proposta de uma Estrutura para o Código da Construção em Portugal no Domínio da Higrotérmica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The growing worry with the quality of buildings, the high complexity of building construction, the lack of systematic knowledge and of an effective system of guarantees and insurance leads to the need of creating a general legal document for the Portuguese construction or a "Building Code", not only from those involved in the construction process but also of its users. Many countries already have implemented their construction technical documents, so, during the current essay, a study of the French (Documents Techniques Unifiés), Spanish (Código Técnico de la Edificación) and Canadian (Code National du Bâtiment) experiences was carried out. This analysis made possible to synthesize the vast information available in that countries and to reflect of their advantages and disadvantages. As regards the hygrothermic performance of buildings, the moisture is one of the main causes of diseases in Portuguese buildings nowadays. For that reason, this investigation was focused on the design rules of walls against the risk of occurring condensation. Therefore, in an initial phase it was necessary to analyze all the technical French, Spanish and Canadian documentation prevailing for this phenomenon. Then, after the achievement of summaries and reviews explanations, it became possible to structure a proposal for the national "Building Code" in the field of hygrothermic, more precisely of the phenomenon of moisture condensation. The proposal has been accomplished according to an exigencial methodology, defining performance requirements of constructive solutions, so that condensation does not occur. Keywords: "Building Code", Hygrothermic, Moisture condensation, Proposal for Portugal, Requirements
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".