MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD), Safety and Tolerability of a Single-Dose Oral Solution of Dabigatran Etexilate Given after Standard Anticoagulant Therapy in Children from Birth to Less Than One Year Old, with Venous Thromboembolism

2016· article· en· W2619745853 on OpenAlexaff
Jacqueline ML Halton, Anne-Caroline Picard, Ruth Harper, Fenglei Huang, Martina Brueckmann, Savion Gropper, Hugo Maas, Igor Tartakovsky, Ildar Nurmeev, Lesley Mitchell, Leonardo R. Brandão, Manuela Albisetti

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical studies and practices
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoUniversity of AlbertaChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDabigatranTolerabilityPharmacodynamicsPharmacokineticsDosingGestational ageAnesthesiaPediatricsInternal medicineAdverse effectWarfarinAtrial fibrillationPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) events are more frequent in neonates than in children of other age groups. The standard of care for pediatric anticoagulation includes unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin, or vitamin K antagonists. However, these treatments have limitations in terms of practicality of use in infants, such as parenteral administration, frequent monitoring and drug interactions. Alternative oral agents that address these shortcomings may improve compliance, efficacy and safety. The safety and efficacy of dabigatran etexilate (DE), a direct thrombin inhibitor, are established in adults; pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies indicate linear PK. There is a relationship between dabigatran plasma concentration (PK) and its PD effects, resulting in reproducible dose-dependent prolongation in clotting times with rapid onset and offset of effect, which is consistent across populations. Although phase IIa studies suggest a similar PK/PD relationship of dabigatran in children and adults, the hemostatic system in infants differs from older children and adults, which may lead to a different PK/PD effect. Objective: To demonstrate comparable PK/PD relationship of DE oral liquid formulation (OLF) between infants and older children and adults, and to assess safety and tolerability. Methods: Open-label, multicenter, single-dose, single-arm, phase IIa pediatric study. Infants aged < 1 year diagnosed with VTE who completed standard anticoagulant treatment for VTE were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included < 37 weeks gestational age at birth, weight < 3 kg, major bleed with standard anticoagulant and swallowing abnormalities. Patients received DE OLF (based on age- and weight-adjusted nomogram) and were followed up for 30 (+7) days. The primary endpoints were PK/PD related, measured at 2 hrs and 12 (±2) hrs after DE administration. The PK endpoint was plasma concentration of total dabigatran, and PD endpoints were activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), ecarin clotting time (ECT) and diluted thrombin time (dTT). Secondary endpoints included incidence of all bleeding events and adverse events (AEs), acceptability and tolerability. Descriptive statistics were applied to the endpoints. PK/PD relationship was analyzed using a simple linear regression model and nonlinear Emax model to confirm whether models used in previous studies were consistent with the pediatric data of this study. Results: Ten patients were screened and 8 entered the study (mean age [SD]: 89 [52] days; range: 41-169 days). Patients received a single dose of DE OLF. The geometric mean (gMean) total dabigatran plasma concentrations 2 hrs post dose (around peak concentrations) was 120 ng/mL with geometric coefficient of variation (gCV) of 62.1%, which indicated moderate variability. The gMean at 12 hrs post dosing was 60.4 ng/mL (gCV 30%), which indicated low variability. The projected steady-state dabigatran trough concentrations were largely comparable to those observed in adults with VTE (Table). A linear PK/PD relationship was observed for ECT (ECT ratio) and dTT (dTT ratio) (Figure). The relationship between total dabigatran concentration and aPTT (aPTT ratio) was nonlinear. The observed PK/PD relationships were similar to those in adult and adolescent patients with VTE, except for patients aged < 2 months, in whom a slight upward shift of aPTT of 10-20% (average) and ECT by 10-15% was observed relative to adults. There were no AEs, deaths or treatment discontinuations during the treatment period. None of the treated patients had any bleeding events or thromboembolic events during the study. One patient had a serious AE (aortic stenosis) during the post-treatment period, which was not considered treatment related by the investigator. There were no clinically relevant or unexpected laboratory findings. The majority of patients were assessed with good tolerability (six patients, 75%), and one patient each (12.5%) was evaluated with satisfactory or bad tolerability. Conclusion: In this small population of infants (aged < 1 year), DE OLF was well tolerated without any treatment-related AEs, thromboembolic or bleeding events. The observed PK/PD relationships were consistent with the established profile in adult and adolescent patients with VTE. Disclosures Halton: Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Pediatric Expert Working Group for Boehringer Ingelheim. Picard:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Harper:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Huang:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Brueckmann:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Gropper:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Maas:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Tartakovsky:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Nurmeev:Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Investigator fees. Mitchell:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Albisetti:Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Pediatric Expert Working Group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicPharmaceutical studies and practicesFrench-language works237,207