MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life during concussion recovery among youth athletes

2017· article· en· W2619859342 on OpenAlexaff
Kelly Russell, Erin Selci, Samuel Fineblit, Michael J. Ellis

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Sports Medicine · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcussionMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)AthletesPhysical therapyCognitionLongitudinal studyPoison controlInjury preventionPsychiatryEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Determine longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in youth during recovery from a sport-related concussion. Design Prospective case-series. Participants 68 youth (13–18 years; 62% male) with an acute sport-related concussion were enrolled with 5 lost to follow-up. Intervention (or assessment of risk factors) Subsequently developing Post-Concussion Syndrome (PCS: symptomatic after 30 days), initial symptom severity (Post Concussion Symptom Scale), concussion history, sex, age, and academic accommodations during recovery. Outcome measures PedsQL Cognitive Functioning Scale and PedsQL 4.0 measured physical, social, and emotional domains of HRQoL. They were administered before each appointment until medical clearance. Multivariable mixed modelling accounted for repeated measures within an athlete and expressed as point increase per week. Main results Initial mean HRQoL was highest for social (non-PCS: 92.7 out of 100; PCS: 86.3), followed by emotional (non-PCS: 86.45; PCS: 69.7), physical (non-PCS: 80.95; PCS: 49.2), and cognitive domains (non-PCS: 69.1; PCS: 50.3). There was effect modification by developing PCS. Changes in HRQoL subscores were: cognitive functioning non-PCS (+9.8 points [95% CI: 6.9, 12.7]) and PCS (+4.2 points [95% CI: 2.8, 5.6]); social HRQoL non-PCS (+2.3 points [1.0, 4.0]) and PCS (+0.5 points [0.1, 1.0); emotional HRQoL non-PCS (+5.0 points [95% CI: 2.9, 7.0]) and PCS points (+2.2 [1.6, 2.9]); and physical non-PCS (+6.3 points [95% CI: [3.5, 9.2]) and PCS (+3.3 points (95% CI: 2.5, 4.2). Conclusions HRQoL significantly improved longitudinally with greater improvement among non-PCS athletes. HRQoL impairment was most apparent in the cognitive and physical domains. Competing interests None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Sports Medicine→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury Research→French-language works237,207→