MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2620259583 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2017-0200

Easy but not straightforward: base and solvent effect on the synthesis of luminescent europium 1,3-di(thien-2-yl)propane-1,3-dionate coordination complexes

2017· article· en· W2620259583 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lidia Armelao, Alice Carlotto, Federica Mian, Jacopo Tessarolo, Gregorio Bottaro, Marzio Rancan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryEuropiumPropaneLuminescenceSupramolecular chemistrySolventPyridineLigand (biochemistry)Yield (engineering)Base (topology)MoleculeIonCrystallographyAbsorption (acoustics)Coordination complexPhosphorInorganic chemistryPhysical chemistryPhotochemistryMedicinal chemistryCrystal structureOrganic chemistryMetal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reaction between EuCl3 and the ligand 1,3-di(thien-2-yl)propane-1,3-dione (L) leads to luminescent coordination compounds [EuL3(EtOH)2] (1), [EuL2(i-PrOH)4]Cl (2) and [EuL3(i-PrOH)2] (3), isolated as single crystals in high yield (70%–95%). The Eu/β-diketonate ratio is tuned from 1:2 to 1:3 through the variation of the alcoholic solvent (ethanol and isopropanol) or the base (pyridine and NaOH). In all compounds, Eu3+ ions are eight-coordinated, and in 2, the molecules are arranged in an H-bond supported supramolecular 1D chain. These compositional and structural differences are reflected also on the absorption and emission properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicLanthanide and Transition Metal ComplexesFrench-language works237,207