MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2620302482

Mapping Knowledge Synthesis - Part II

2014· article· en· W2620302482 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Αναστασία Μαλλίδου

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipFoundation (evidence)Health careKnowledge translationLibrary scienceWork (physics)Medical educationNursingSociologyMedicinePolitical scienceEngineeringKnowledge management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anastasia Mallidou, RN, PhD is an Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, University of Victoria. She completed her doctoral studies at the University of Alberta supported by the Hellenic States Scholarship (IKY) and postdoctoral fellowship supported by the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation (CHSRF) and the former Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR). Her research interests include health services research (e.g., the impact of work environment on safety practices, residential care facilities for older people), knowledge translation/utilization, leadership, systematic reviews, health policy, and interdisciplinary education and practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.208
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.460
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2080.460
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.010
Bibliometrics0.0330.044
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0130.010
Open science0.0040.008
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNursing Diagnosis and DocumentationFrench-language works237,207