MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2620353794 · doi:10.15173/m.v1i22.818

Compound 186 is a Negative Allosteric Modulator of Dopamine D2 Receptors: Implications for Improving Schizophrenia Therapy

2013· article· en· W2620353794 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jayant Bhandari, Jordan Mah, Ritesh P. Daya, Rodney L. Johnson, Ram K. Mishra

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Meducator · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllosteric modulatorSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Allosteric regulationNeuroscienceDopamine receptor D3DopamineDopamine receptor D2ReceptorDopamine receptorPharmacologyPsychologyMedicinePsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Excessive dopamine transmission in the striatum via the dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) has been implicated in inducing positive symptoms of schizophrenia (such as hallucinations and delusions). While it is known that antipsychotic drugs alleviate these symptoms by blocking the active site of D2R, other drugs such as allosteric modulators can also decrease dopamine’s ability to bind this receptor, by binding to an allosteric site on D2R. We evaluated the ability of a newly synthesized molecule, compound 186, to modulate the binding of tritiated norpropylapomorphine (NPA)—a high-affinity D2R agonist—in the bovine striatum. Through receptor binding assays, we found a significant, dose-dependent decrease in NPA binding with compound 186. Our findings suggest a potential method to treat dopaminergic disorders such as schizophrenia. Because many of the current treatments for schizophrenia that block the active site of D2R can produce severe side effects, it is important to consider using allosteric modulators in place of antagonists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe MeducatorSame topicCyclopropane Reaction MechanismsFrench-language works237,207