MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2620800623 · doi:10.15353/vsnl.v1i1.41

Numerical Spectral Demulitplexing Microscopy of Measurements from an Anatomical Specimen

2015· article· en· W2620800623 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jason Deglint, Farnoud Kazemzadeh, Alexander Wong, David A. Clausi

Bibliographic record

VenueVision Letters · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultispectral imageMicroscopyMicroscopeOptical microscopeFluorescence microscopeOpticsMaterials scienceRGB color modelFluorescencePhysicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryRemote sensingScanning electron microscopeComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceGeographyChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Multispectral microscopy is a method of capturing spectral bands<br />using a microscope, and is used to observe specimens on a micron<br />or nano scale. However, these systems are limited because they<br />cannot capture transient phenomena since they cannot capture simultaneous<br />spectral information. We propose a new method called<br />numerical spectral demultiplexing microscopy (NSDM) which utilizes<br />a Raspberry Pi camera to capture RGB measurements and<br />then infer narrow-band multispectral spectra. This is accomplished<br />by training a non-linear regression random forest model based on<br />the spectral sensitivity of the camera which allows for a low-cost,<br />portable, and simultaneous capture multispectral microscopy system.<br />We use the NSDM system as a bright-field multispectral microscope<br />and a dark-field fluorescence multispectral microscope<br />on an anatomical specimen and show that additional information<br />can be gathered by combining a bright-field and dark-field fluorescence<br />microscope.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVision LettersSame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207