MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2620819750 · doi:10.3402/blft.v5.23764

Littler Red Riding Hoods

2014· article· no· W2620819750 on OpenAlexaffabout
Perry Nodelman

Bibliographic record

VenueBarnelitterært forskningstidsskrift · 2014
Typearticle
Languageno
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTreasureAppealAudience measurementHistoryClassicsMedia studiesSociologyPolitical scienceLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Revisioning Red Riding Hood around the World, Sandra Beckett presents 52 versions of the tale of Little Red Riding Hood in English translations from 15 other languages, representing authors, illustrators, and publishers from a globetrotter’s list of countries: Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Cuba, Czech Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Korea, Lebanon, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Russia, Spain, and Switzerland. While some of the original texts first appeared in the early 20th century, most were published after 1970, and about half of them in the last two decades. While the book has been published by a university press, comments on the back cover of the paperback edition I read suggest it might be appropriate for an audience of students and other less specialized readers as well as for researchers in the field of fairy tales: in these comments, Cristina Bacchilega speaks of the book’s potential appeal to ‘‘a wide English-speaking readership’’ and Vanessa Joosen says, ‘‘What a treasure trove for researchers, what an eye-opener for students, and what a joy to read for all those interested in fairy tales, children’s literature, and world literature.’’ Unlike Bacchilega and Joosen, I am disappointed by this anthology*mostly because, based on their comments and the book’s title, I had such high expectations for it. I was looking forward to what the title identifies as ‘‘an anthology of international retellings’’ of the tale of Red Riding Hood from ‘‘around the world.’’ I wanted to learn how, as Sandra Beckett promises in her introduction, ‘‘the number and diversity of these retellings from the four corners of the globe demonstrate the tale’s remarkable versatility and its unique status in the collective unconscious and in literary culture, even beyond the confines of the Western world’’ (11). Unfortunately, though, both the world this anthology represents and the tales it retells are worrisomely incomplete. There is less here than there ideally ought to be. First, there is less of the world. The globe as depicted here is missing one of its four corners* the one where English is spoken. While Revisioning Red Riding Hood does make a lot of previously unavailable and often interesting material available to the English-speaking parts of the world, it also bypasses the existing English-language context in a way that significantly limits the audience Nordic Journal of ChildLit Aesthetics Vol. 5, 2014

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBarnelitterært forskningstidsskriftSame topicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207