Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Neurapraxia is considered to be a temporary disorder of peripheral nerve conduction due to trauma that does not cause axonopathy. However, patients with radiculopathy, confirmed by MRI, who may not have active axonal damage with evidence of spontaneous activity may still report transient give-way weaknesss. In the absence of active changes on intramuscular recording a neurophysiologic consultation may fail to substantiate any significant neurologic concern. This report documents and objectifies prone positioning-induced radicular neurapraxic weakness in an elderly man. Methods: An 83-year-old gentleman was referred for neuromuscular evaluation with regards to peripheral neuropathy. He had a history of low back pain and MRI evidence of multilevel DDD and discogenic neuroforaminal narrowing. Strength testing was performed by Biodex evaluation. Routine electrophysiologic assessments were performed. Results: On neurologic examination proximal strength iwas normal with grade 4 dorsiflexion strength. Stocking-glove loss to pinprick was absent. Preliminary objective testing of the right quadriceps revealed a peak torque of 87.1 Nm. Immediately after lying prone for 3 minutes (for paraspinal EMG), his power dropped to 33.7 Nm. Strength fully recovered by 36 hrs. Conclusions: This case documents evidence of a 61% reversible reduction in torque in the right quadriceps after prone lying. Electromyographers need to be cautious with radiculopathy patients during paraspinal testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.238 | 0.040 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".