MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2621109533 · doi:10.2514/6.2017-4247

Development of a Non-Intrusive Ultrasound Ice Accretion Sensor to Detect and Quantify Ice Accretion Severity

2017· article· en· W2621109533 on OpenAlexaff
Dan Fuleki, Zhigang Sun, Jason Wu, Grael Miller

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsAccretion (finance)Remote sensingGeologyAstrophysicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supercooled liquid water and ice crystals are atmospheric icing conditions that degrade flight safety of aircraft by affecting the performance of the airframe, air data probes and engines. A key way this threat is mitigated is by using icing detectors on the aircraft to either detect the environment or to detect when ice is accreted on a surface. This information allows the aircraft anti-icing systems to be enabled or have the aircraft exit the environment. This paper discusses a non-intrusive technology developed at NRC that can detect ice accretion on a surface and quantify its severity. The technology features a custom thin-film ultrasound transducer made to withstand in-flight conditions, combined with proprietary signal processing algorithms. Initial development was carried out in environmental chamber and icing wind tunnel tests, exposing the prototype sensors to a range of temperature, humidity, altitude and icing conditions. This technology, referred to as the Ultrasound Ice Accretion Sensor (UIAS), was then implemented in a collaborative NASA/Honeywell/ICC ice crystal icing test of a Honeywell/Lycoming turbofan aircraft engine, model ALF502. This was a full scale, altitude engine test which simulated a wide range of inflight ice crystal icing conditions. The UIAS’s were not only effective in detecting when ice had accreted but were also able to estimate the severity of the icing. This detection happened in a very short period of time; much sooner than the early performance warning indicators seen from engine and test cell instrumentation, which is key in providing the aircraft and pilot time to address the icing threat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207