MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2621329470 · doi:10.1177/1748006x17710816

Optimizing the re-profiling policy regarding metropolitan train wheels based on a semi-Markov decision process

2017· article· en· W2621329470 on OpenAlexaff
Zengqiang Jiang, Dragan Banjević, E Mingcheng, Bing Li

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRailway Engineering and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesCentral University Basic Research Fund of ChinaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsFlangeProfiling (computer programming)Markov decision processImperfectComputer scienceMathematical optimizationEngineeringStructural engineeringMathematicsMarkov processStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we present a maintenance model for metropolitan train wheels subjected to diameter or flange thickness overruns that includes condition monitoring with periodic inspection. We present a dynamic ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) policy based on condition monitoring information, where [Formula: see text] is the wheel flange thickness threshold that triggers preventive re-profiling and [Formula: see text] is the recovery value for the wheel flange thickness after preventive re-profiling. The problem is modelled as a semi-Markov decision process that considers wear in terms of the diameter and flange thickness simultaneously. The problem is formulated in a two-dimensional state space; this space is defined as a combination of the diameter state and the flange thickness state. The model also considers imperfect wheel maintenance. The model’s objective is to minimize the maintenance cost per unit time that is expected in the long run. We apply a policy-iteration algorithm as the computational approach to determine the optimal re-profiling policy and use an example to demonstrate the method’s effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and ReliabilitySame topicRailway Engineering and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207