The larval sensilla on the antennae and mouthparts of five species of Cossidae (Lepidoptera)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most species in the family Cossidae can migrate from one host to a new one in later larval instars, which is different from other bark- and wood-boring insects. In this study, we selected Eogystia hippophaecolus (Hua, Chou, Fang and Chen, 1990), Deserticossus artemisiae (Chou and Hua, 1986), Deserticossus arenicola (Staudinger, 1879), Yakudza vicarius (Walker, 1865), and Streltzoviella insularis (Staudinger, 1892) to understand how these species locate new hosts in their larval stages. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to determine the typology, morphology, number, and distribution of sensilla on the antennae, maxillary palps, galeas, and labial palps of these five species. There were no differences in typology, morphology, and number of sensilla between the five species. We observed antenna with three to four short sensilla basiconica, two sensilla chaetica, four sensilla basiconica, and one sensillum styloconicum. The maxillary palp had seven short sensilla basiconica, one sensillum digitiformium, and two sensilla placodea. The maxillary galea had three short sensilla basiconica, two sensilla styloconica, and one sensillum chaeticum. The labial palp had one short sensillum basiconicum and one sensillum styloconicum. Our results will provide a basis for further studies on the feeding, host-transfer behaviors, and electrophysiology of this group of forest pests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".