PARTISIPASI WARGA DALAM PELESTARIAN BANGUNAN DAN STRUKTUR CAGAR BUDAYA DI BALUWARI
Classification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p><em>The participation of citizen in the conservation of heritage buildings and structures on Surakarta Baluwarti background by conservation measures are often perceived as a barrier to regional development. It causes people to be hesitant in doing conservation measures. Baluwarti been determined to be of cultural heritage, the citizen in Baluwarti required to actively participate in the conservation of cultural heritage buildings and structures. Conservation of cultural heritage in Baluwarti not limited to protection, but also includes the utilization and development. The problem in this research is how much the participation of citizens in the conservation of cultural heritage buildings and structures in the area of Surakarta Baluwarti. The method used is to conduct field observations, distributing questionnaires, and analyzes the frequency distribution and descriptive analysis. The results of the level of citizen participation Baluwarti in the conservation of buildings and structures in the region. The results of this study indicate that the level of citizen participation at the level Baluwarti being. This result indicates the persistence of participation in conservation, but need to increase the participation of buildings and structures related to the conservation of cultural heritage Baluwarti.</em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords:</em></strong><em> </em><em>Building and Structure, </em><em>Conservation, Cultural Heritage</em><em>, </em><em>Participation.</em></p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it