MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2621807230 · doi:10.2527/asasann.2017.340

340 Metabolomics-based profiling identifies serum signatures that predict the risk of metritis in transition dairy cows

2017· article· en· W2621807230 on OpenAlexaff
Guanshi Zhang, Qiming Deng, Raju K. Mandal, David S. Wishart, Burim N. Ametaj

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetritisMetaboliteMetabolomicsMetabolomeUnivariate analysisRetained placentaEndometritisChemistryInternal medicineAnimal scienceChromatographyMedicineMultivariate analysisBiologyIce calvingPregnancyLactationPlacenta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objectives of this study were to identify metabolite signatures in the blood of dairy cows before, during, and after diagnosis of metritis that could be used to predict the risk of metritis in transition dairy cows. Direct-injection liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectroscopy was used to analyze serum samples collected from both 20 healthy (CON) and 6 metritic cows during −8 and −4 wk, at disease diagnosis, and +4 and +8 wk relative to parturition. Univariate (Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test by R; statistical significance: P < 0.05) and multivariate data (i.e., principal component analysis and partial least squares discriminant analysis [PLS-DA]; permutation test for the PLS-DA model, P < 0.05) analyses were conducted to examine alterations of serum metabolites throughout the progress of the disease. Results from univariate analysis indicated that cows with metritis experienced altered concentrations of multiple serum AA, glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids, acylcarnitines, and hexose during the entire experimental period. Principal component analysis and PLS-DA analyses showed clearly separated clusters for the 2 groups on the basis of measured serum metabolites during 5 time points. It is interesting to note that throughout the 17 wk of the study, several serum metabolites (e.g., PC aa C30:0, PC ae C30:1, SM [OH] C24:1, and SM C24:0) appeared to play a consistent role in distinguishing between the CON and metritic cows. For example, concentrations of PC ae C30:1 were consistently 2-fold greater in premetritic (i.e., mean of 3.10 μM [SEM 0.46] vs. mean of 1.32 μM [SEM 0.18; P = 0.002] at −8 wk prepartum and mean of 1.91 μM [SEM 0.22] vs. mean of 0.83 μM [SEM 0.10; P = 0.001] at −4 wk prepartum) and metritic (1.89 ± 0.23 vs. 0.90 ± 0.11; P = 0.001 at the disease week) cows compared with CON cows. Furthermore, 5 metabolic pathways (i.e., Lys degradation, biotin metabolism, Trp metabolism, Val–Leu–Ile degradation, and protein biosynthesis) were altered in both premetritic and metritic cows. These new findings give insights into the pathomechanism of metritis in dairy cows. Moreover, the area under the curve for 5 ROC curves was 0.995 (95% CI 0.945 to 1) at −8 wk, 0.992 (95% CI 0.938 to 1) at −4 wk, 0.988 (95% CI 0.913 to 1) at disease week, 1 (95% CI 1 to 1) at +4 wk, and 0.99 (95% CI 1 to 1) at 8 wk, respectively, which suggests that serum biomarkers identified have pretty accurate predictive, diagnostic, and prognostic abilities for metritis in transition dairy cows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology→French-language works237,207→