MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

PREVENTING CONCUSSIONS IN YOUTH ICE HOCKEY: THE EFFECT OF LOCAL BODY CHECKING POLICY CHANGE

2017· article· en· W2621857799 on OpenAlexaffabout
Amanda M. Black, Brent Hagel, Kathryn Schneider, Willem Meeuwisse, Luz Palacios‐Derflingher, Shelina Babul, Martin Mrázik, Carolyn A. Emery

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Sports Medicine · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaHotchkiss Brain InstituteAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIce hockeyConcussionLeagueEliteMedicinePoison controlInjury preventionPsychologyPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedical emergencyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background In 2013, Hockey Canada announced a national policy change delaying the introduction of body checking in ice hockey until Bantam (ages 13–14). Following this change, several local organizations in Canada changed policy to also disallow body checking in Bantam non-elite levels (lower 60–70% by division of play). Objective To determine if the risk of concussion and severe concussion differs for non-elite Bantam ice hockey players in leagues where body checking is permitted compared with leagues where local policy change removed body checking. Design Cohort study. Setting Ice hockey rinks (2014/15, 2015/16 seasons). Participants Youth ice hockey players in non-elite Bantam body checking leagues (52 teams, 653 players) in Calgary and Edmonton (2014/15) and non-body checking leagues (33 teams, 396 players) in Kelowna and Vancouver (2014/15) and Calgary (2015/16), Canada. Assessment of Risk Factors Exposure to a Bantam league where body checking was not allowed. Main Outcome Measurements Suspected concussions were identified by a team designate and referred to a sport medicine physician. Severe concussions were defined by greater than 10 days of time-loss from ice hockey. Results There were 47 game-related concussions (Incidence Proportion per 100 players [IP] =7.2; 95% CI; 5.33-9.46) and 27 severe concussions (IP=4.1; 95% CI; 2.74-5.96) in body checking leagues. In non-body checking leagues there were 12 concussions (IP=3.03; 95% CI; 1.58-5.23) and 8 severe concussions (IP=2.02; 95% CI; 0.87-3.94). There was no evidence of a difference between the non-body checking leagues in Kelowna and Vancouver (2014/15) and Calgary (2015/16). Preliminary univariate analysis indicates a protective effect of policy disallowing body checking [risk ratio (RR)=0.42 (95% CI; 0.2-0.88) for concussion and RR=0.49 (95% CI; 0.23-1.04) for severe concussion. Conclusions This preliminary analysis suggests a 58% lower risk of game-related concussion in non-elite Bantam leagues where local policy disallows body checking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Sports Medicine→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury Research→French-language works237,207→