“Finally when I started falling down”: Indigenous tuberculosis patient experiences of health and illness on the Canadian prairies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper adds evidence to a growing body of literature seeking to understand the disproportionate occurrence of tuberculosis (TB) in Indigenous populations of Canada and reveals insights that may inform effective interventions. As a disease, TB is recognized as a disorder of the body, for which there are successful treatments. Its persistence in some populations, however, requires an understanding of TB as an illness, whereby disease is shaped into behaviours and experiences. Fifty-five self-identified Indigenous participants with infectious pulmonary TB completed a questionnaire and an interview as part of the Determinants of Tuberculosis Transmission (DTT) project. Questionnaire data report on sociodemographic information and exposure to TB risk factors, while interview data describe participants’ experiences of TB within the context of their personal histories and everyday lives. Analysis showed that TB symptoms did not stand out as unusual in the everyday life and health experiences of participants. State of health and decisions about accessing healthcare were associated with socioeconomic deprivation, as well as negative experiences connected with historical and contemporary impacts of colonization. The “tipping point” concept effectively captures the shift in health that pushes participants to seek healthcare. Family, friends, and other caregivers are important influences and need to be part of the effort to avoid advanced TB illness and stop the cycle of transmission. More significantly, there is a need to address the structures and systems that produce and perpetuate life conditions that result in a usual state of compromised health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".