MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2622159948 · doi:10.1161/str.44.suppl_1.a79

Abstract 79: Troponin T, NT-proBNP, and Incidence of Stroke: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

2013· article· en· W2622159948 on OpenAlexaff
Aaron R. Folsom, Vijay Nambi, Elizabeth J. Bell, Oludamilola Oluleye, Rebecca F. Gottesman, Pamela L. Lutsey, Rachel Huxley, Christie M. Ballantyne

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsChristie (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Hazard ratioInternal medicineCardiologyNatriuretic peptideTroponinTroponin TPopulationLacunar strokeIncidence (geometry)Rotterdam StudyBiomarkerProspective cohort studyMyocardial infarctionHeart failureIschemic strokeConfidence intervalIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increased levels of plasma troponins and natriuretic peptides in the general population are associated with increased future risk of cardiovascular disease, but only limited information exists on these biomarkers and stroke occurrence. In a prospective epidemiological study, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, we tested the hypothesis that high-sensitivity troponin T (TnT) and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are associated positively with incidence of stroke. We measured plasma high-sensitivity TnT and NT-proBNP in 10,902 men or women initially free of stroke and followed them for a mean of 11.3 years for stroke occurrence (n=507). Analyses were performed using proportional hazards modeling. Both biomarkers were associated positively with total stroke, nonlacunar ischemic, and especially, cardioembolic stroke, but not with lacunar or hemorrhagic stroke. After adjustment for other stroke risk factors, the hazard ratio (95% CI) per one SD greater increment of natural log-transformed TnT was 1.23 (1.13, 1.35) for total stroke, 1.27 (1.15, 1.40) for total ischemic stroke, and 1.36 (1.14, 1.62) for cardioembolic stroke. Likewise, the hazard ratio per one SD greater natural log-transformed NT-proBNP, was 1.37 (1.26, 1.49) for total stroke, 1.39 (1.27, 1.53) for total ischemic stroke, and 1.95 (1.67, 2.28) for cardioembolic stroke. The hazard ratios for jointly high values of TnT (≥0.013 ug/L) and NT-proBNP (≥155.2 pg/mL), versus neither biomarker high, were 2.70 (1.92, 3.79) for total stroke and 6.26 (3.40, 11.5) for cardioembolic stroke, and somewhat stronger for NT-proBNP than TnT. Strikingly, approximately 58% of cardioembolic strokes occurred in the highest quintile of pre-stroke NT-proBNP (versus 3% occurring in the lowest quintile), and 32% of cardioembolic strokes occurred in participants who had both NT-proBNP in the highest quintile and were known by ARIC to have atrial fibrillation sometime before their cardioembolic stroke occurrence. In conclusion, in the general population, elevated plasma TnT and NT-proBNP concentrations are associated with increased risk of cardioembolic and other nonlacunar ischemic strokes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors→French-language works237,207→